St.Joseph College of Engineering            St.Joseph College of Engineering
Upcoming/Live Program : * St. Joseph College of Engineering Organized “11th GRADUATION DAY as on 25.01.2025” | * SJCE Organized "National Brainstorming Championship and IDEA EXPO Register here...
×
NAAC


.

SELF STUDY REPORT (SSR)

SSR – Click Here

CRITERION 1 – Curricular Aspects (100).

Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation (20)​
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
1.1.1
QlM
The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment 20

Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
1.2.1
QnM
Number of Certificate/Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years) 15
1.2.2
QnM
Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. as against the total number of students during the last five years 15

Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
1.3.1
QlM
Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability in transacting the Curriculum 10
1.3.2
QnM
Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year) 20
Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System (20)​
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
1.4.1
QnM
Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website

Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows:
A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken& communicated to the relevant bodies and feedback hosted on the institutional website
B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken and communicated to the relevant bodies
C. Feedback collected and analysed
D. Feedback collected
E. Feedback not collected
20

CRITERION 2 – Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)

Key Indicator – 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)​
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.1.1
QnM
Enrolment percentage 20
2.1.2
QnM
Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years 20

Key Indicator – 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.2.1
QnM
Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 40

Key Indicator – 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.3.1
QlM
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process 40

Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)​
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.4.1
QnM
Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years 15
2.4.2
QnM
Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) 25

Key Indicator – 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.5.1
QlM
Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient 40

Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.6.1
QlM
Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on websit 25
2.6.2
QlM
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. 20
2.6.3
QnM
Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students) 45

Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
2.7.1
QnM
Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. 60

CRITERION 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension (110)

Key Indicator- 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research (10)​
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
3.1.1
QnM
Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years. 10

Key Indicator- 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem (15).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
3.2.1
QlM
Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident 10
3.2.2
QnM
Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years 5

Key Indicator- 3.3 Research Publication and Awards (25).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
3.3.1
QnM
Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years 10
3.3.2
QnM
Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years 15

Key Indicator- 3.4 Extension Activities (40).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
3.4.1
QlM
Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years. 15
3.4.2
QlM
Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognised bodies. 5
3.4.3
QnM
Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years 20

Key Indicator- 3.5 Collaboration (20).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
3.5.1
QnM
Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years 20

CRITERION 5 – Student Support and Progression (140).

Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (50)
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
5.1.1
QnM
Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years 20
5.1.2
QnM
Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students’ capability
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, selfemployment and entrepreneurial skills)
4. Awareness of trends in technology
10
5.1.3
QnM
Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years 10
5.1.4
QnM
The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies
2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees
10

Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (35).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
5.2.1
QnM
Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years 25
5.2.2
QnM
Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years 10

Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
5.3.1
QnM
Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years 20
5.3.2
QnM
Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years 25

Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
5.4.1
QlM
There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services 10

CRITERION 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100).

Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
6.1.1
QlM
The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan. 15

Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
6.2.1
QlM
The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc. 8
6.2.2
QnM
Institution implements e-governance in its operations
1. Administration including complaint management
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examinations
4

Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
6.3.1
QlM
The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression 6
6.3.2
QnM
Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years 12
6.3.3
QnM
Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years 15

Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
6.4.1
QlM
Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) 10

Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
6.5.1
QlM
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities 15
6.5.2
QnM
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements
2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) / membership of international networks
3. Participation in NIRF
4. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc
15

CRITERION 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100).

Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
7.1.1
QlM
Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. 10
7.1.2
QnM
The Institution has facilities and initiatives for
1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures
2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste
3. Water conservation
4. Green campus initiatives
5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment
20
7.1.3
QnM
Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following
1. Green audit / Environment audit
2. Energy audit
3. Clean and green campus initiatives
4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities
10
7.1.4
QlM
Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens 10

Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
7.2.1
QlM
Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual 30

Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20).
METRIC NO. DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
7.3.1
QlM
Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words 20

BEST PRACTICES

Best Practice - I


1. Title of the Practice: Enhancing Academic and Placement Opportunities for Students facing Academic Challenges.

2. Objective of the Practice: Our institutions primary objective is to equip academically disadvantaged students to thrive as engineers through our comprehensive academic coaching and training programs, boosting their employability. On an average 60% of students getting admission in SJCE has lower cutoff scores, typically below 140. We aim to transform them into competent professionals by strengthening their academic competencies and soft skills, Our approach focuses on ensuring students eligibility as engineering graduates along with personal and professional development. Integral components include interview techniques, resume building, internships, industrial visits, and soft skills development. With the support of dedicated Faculty and Placement Cell our efforts empower students to pursue successful and rewarding careers.

3. The Context :
Empowering academically disadvantaged students to succeed as engineers through academic coaching and placement training.
Recognizing the importance of strong academic foundation and skill sets in the competitive engineering job market.
Administering the regular cycle tests for academic excellence and conducting annual
10- day training sessions.
Covering various areas in training including general aptitude, interview skills, group discussions, communication, confidence building and English Grammar.
Intensive weekly soft skills sessions for consistent skill development and confidence building.

4. The Practice :
The students are ensured of their academic performance. Regular Cycle tests, Internal Assessment tests, Model Examinations, Special coaching sessions conducted before the exams make the students to get through the University examinations.
All the students must attend the placement and training classes taken up by external sources irrespective of their academic performance.
The students were given training on Communication Skills, Interview Presentation, Personality Management Skills, Group Discussions, Body Language Postures, Aptitude Skills, Verbal and Non – Verbal Skills.
In addition to the training by external resources, the management conducts the training classes on all the working Saturdays. The above training is conducted by the management supported by Faculty Members from MBA department and Placement Officer. During the above training period, Mock interviews are also conducted to boost the confidence of the students. 
Industrial visits are arranged for the students to enhance their technical skills.

5. Evidence of Success : The success can be demonstrated through the academic and placement records.
The implementation of regular cycle tests, internal assessments, and specialized coaching sessions has resulted in a noticeable improvement in academic performance among students facing academic challenges.
Our Comprehensive placement and training exhibited the remarkable enrichment in their employability skills. evidenced by improved performance in interviews.

6. Problems encountered and Resource required
The effectiveness of academic coaching and soft skill training relies on active participation and a willingness to learn. Non-interested students lack motivation and engagement during the academic coaching and placement training sessions, hindering the effectiveness of the program. Few students are less likely to apply the learned soft skills in real life situations limiting the practical impact of the training. Without genuine interest certain students have low retention of the information provided during the training reducing the benefits of the program.

Best Practice-II



1. Title of the Practice: Green Eco-friendly Campus

2. Objectives of the Practice:
Enhance campus greenery, mitigate environmental degradation, instill nature responsibility in students, foster sustainability culture, and promote environmental stewardship to create a greener, more responsible community.

To provide a learning environment that is not just scenic but also eco-friendly.

3. The Context:
Tree plantation is crucial for environmental conservation and sustainable development,combating climate change, enhancing biodiversity, and improving air quality while offering socio-economic benefits. A clean, green campus promotes optimal learning, and effective waste management creates a sanitary, eco-friendly environment.

4. The Practice:
Policies are established and enforced to promote green initiatives and effective waste management on campus. The campus greenery is meticulously cared by a team comprising gardeners, faculty members, and students from various departments.

On birthdays, farewells, and final-year departures, individuals plant trees in remembrance, contributing to ongoing campus greening efforts and fostering environmental stewardship.

Our herbal garden blends aromatic herbs with unique healing properties and culinarydelights, fostering a reconnection with nature gifts and inner harmony. After planting, ateam of students, faculty, and maintenance staff monitors tree growth and health,ensuring survival through regular watering, mulching, and pruning.

Green campus campaign and eco-friendly pactices maintain a clean, verdant environment. Eco-Swatch Club fosters energy-saving ethos among students and periodic environmental audit are conducted by external resources. Recycling wastewater for gardening reduces consumption. Rainwater harvesting facilities across campus store rainwater for groundwater replenishment, with continuous water level monitoring. A quality drinking water system, including an RO plant and filtration station, is maintained.Treated water is stored in nearby ponds to elevate the local water table.

Measures are implemented to minimize plastic usage on campus, targeting plastic bottles,straws, utensils, and food packaging. Separate bins are provided for segregating degradable and non-degradable waste in solid and liquid waste.

SJCE campus motor vehicle restricted area prohibits entry and parking, ensuring safety,pedestrian access, and an academic-friendly environment within the premises.

E-waste are properly stored in a separate location and it is collected by the vendor and agreement has been signed for proper disposal.

5. Evidence of Success:

With around 700 trees, the campus serves as a sanctuary for diverse insects and birds. Itsgreenery not only enhances beauty but also raises environmental awareness among students. Striving for minimal waste and reduced plastic use, our institution earned the Green Eco-friendly Campus Award from Lions Club and NGOs.

Institution building designed for optimal natural resource utilization. Outgoing students annual tree plantation demonstrates commitment to conservation and sustainability. Their collective action significantly greens the campus and promotes environmenta responsibility. We remain steadfast in nurturing and preserving the environment for future generations.

6. Problems Encountered and Resources Required:

Despite the abundance of plants, the soil and groundwater conditions within our institution pose significant challenges. Moving forward, we remain committed to organizing similar initiatives and integrating sustainability principles into our institutionalpractices. By continuing to engage and empower our community, we aim to create a more resilient and environmentally responsible campus for future generations.

INSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTIVENESS

Enabling Dreams Through Fee Waiver And Empowering Education For Underprivileged Students


SJCE takes the pride in the commitment to accessibility and inclusivity in education. One of the significant paths through which we fulfill this commitment is our exclusive Institutional Fee Waiver Scheme. This scheme extends beyond governmental scholarships, aiming to address the educational needs of economically disadvantaged students.
SJCE firmly believes that education is the great equalizer for the economically disadvantaged since the financial barriers prevents many talented individuals from pursuing higher education. In acknowledging this reality, our institution recognizes that mere governmental scholarships may not suffice to bridge the gap for all deserving students. The fixed fee structure, while affordable for some, remains an obstacle for others, particularly those belonging to economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Hence, our fee waiver scheme emerges as an inspiration of hope, offering a lifeline to students who would otherwise find themselves unable to afford engineering education.

INSTITUTIONAL FEE WAIVER SCHEME

the student will be waived off from the actual fees which is fixed as ₹ 1,00,000/- per candidate. The fee amount of ₹ 1,00,000/- is unimaginable for certain families even if the government provides scholarship ranging from ₹25,000/- to ₹50,000/-Thus SJCE is acutely aware that access to quality education should not be confined to the privileged few, but rather, it should be a right extended to all, regardless of their financial backgrounds.
To ensure that the fee waiver scheme reaches those who need it at the most most and to maintain academic standards, the eligibility criteria have been precisely created. The applicants must exhibit the academic records by a minimum of 60% in their Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) examination.
Furthermore to qualify for the fee waiver, the annual family income of the applicant should not exceed Rs. 1,00,000/-. This income threshold ensures that the scholarship is directed toward individuals from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, for whom financial constraints might otherwise pose insurmountable barriers to pursuing higher education.
SJCE also recognizes the unique challenges faced by students from single-parent households, we extend preferential treatment to their wards. This acknowledgment of their circumstances underscores our institution's commitment to supporting individuals facing additional hurdles on their educational journey.
Adding on SJCE offers a remarkable opportunity for students who excel academically, providing a 100% fee waiver for those who achieve above 90% in their HSC examinations. This generous initiative not only recognizes outstanding academic achievement but also alleviates financial burdens, enabling deserving students to pursue their engineering education without financial constraints.
Securing the fee waiver for the first year is just the beginning; the students must meet specific conditions to retain the scholarship in subsequent years. These conditions are designed to foster academic excellence, accountability, and responsible conduct. The first criteria for continuing the fee waiver is maintaining a minimum of 80% attendance ensures active engagement with the course and facilitates a conducive learning environment. Also, Adherence to disciplinary norms and university regulations is non-negotiable, reflecting our commitment to upholding institutional values and fostering a culture of integrity.
Beyond the numerical figures and eligibility criteria, the Institutional Fee Waiver Scheme embodies a profound commitment to social equity and educational empowerment. By extending financial assistance beyond governmental offerings, we signal our dedication to nurturing talent and creating opportunities for all segments of society. The transformative power of education cannot be overstated, and our fee waiver initiative serves as a catalyst for social mobility, unlocking doors to a world of knowledge and opportunities.
The fee waiver scheme's impact reaches far beyond individuals, resonating across communities and society. Investing in the education of economically disadvantaged students seeds future innovation, entrepreneurship, and socio-economic development. Regardless of financial backgrounds, we nurture tomorrow's engineers; ensuring talent isn't squandered due to financial constraints.
Additionally, educational empowerment's ripple effects extend beyond academia. Equipping individuals with skills and knowledge fosters a more inclusive and prosperous society. Education transcends academics, serving as a tool for social transformation, empowering individuals to break free from poverty's shackles and realize their full potential.

Criteria for Fee Waiver Scheme:
 Fee Waiver scheme can be availed from First year Onwards.
 The Percentage of above 50% in the HSC is enough for applying the fee waiver.
 The annual income of the family should not exceed 1,00,000/- per annum.
 Ward of single parent will be given preference
 The fee waiver will be continued for further years under the following conditions.
(i) Should maintain 80% attendance or above
(ii) Should pass all subjects in single attempt (without backlog)
(iii)Should not get involved in any in disciplinary activities and should not violate the rules and regulations of the University

FEE WAIVER DETAILS - Click to View


Conclusion : Our engineering institution is dedicated to promoting inclusivity and equal access to education. During the last 5 academic years about 80% of the students have availed the opportunity and have achieved their dreams with the amount less than Rs. 30,000/- per year on an average. Our Institutional fee waiver stands with this commitment, offering an unparalleled opportunity for economically disadvantaged students who meet the specified criteria. By providing financial support, we aim to empower these students who are at the rim of the poverty line to pursue their dreams and excel in the field of engineering. We believe that every deserving individual should have the chance to access quality education, and our fee waiver scheme program is a significant step toward realizing this vision.

INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN

INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN - Click to View

DVV Clarifications

EXTENDED PROFILE